The man who dies in service of his country may be forever "at peace, blest by an English heaven," the "richer dust" of England living, immortal, in the bodies of its soldiers, fallen in faraway lands.
Their uniforms, their psychological and physical health are destroyed. War can not be called sweet but horrible.
Rupert Brooke and Wilfred Owen were both English soldier poets of the First World War, but their poetic output was very different and reflected the chasm that separated them in terms of actual war experience.
His poems of war reflect an attitude held by many early in the war, when thousands of young men rushed to enlist in the hope of winning glory for themselves and their country.
Owen opposes to the idea of fighting in a war. Wilfred Owen focuses on the tragedy of war and the conditions of the soldiers. That shows how the battle has severely damaged the spirits of the soldiers.
He considers this a lie for most soldiers after they see and live the reality of the war as soldiers.
Owen was an active soldier who died in the trenches just a week before the war ended, having seen some of the thickest fighting of the war. If they die on foreign soil, that land will be forever part of England because their soul remains there along with their values and love for England.
However, Brooke never knew what war was like, as he died in His language is vivid, deliberately unpleasant: Generally, one thinks of a soldier as a man full of strength, who looks brave with his uniform and marches confidently to war.
In contrast, Owen tries to make the soldiers look like penniless men and gives a sense of their non-glorified reality. Therefore, his poem is very idealistic.
War and death are the themes of both poems but they are written from different perspectives. Brooke does not describe the horrible nature of death in war and only tells how the soldier honors England by dying while defending the nation.
No clean deaths for these men, but "guttering, choking, drowning," "blood The two poets take different approaches in portraying the effect that war has on the people involved.
Already have an account? His poem condemns those who told "the Old Lie: What Owen shows us is that the idea of war as a heroic quest which can result in an honorable death is an idea that could only be propagated by those who had never known battle.
In fact, Brooke died of a blood infection on his way to the Dardanelles before he had seen action.The Comparison and Contrast“ Dulce et Decorum est,” by Wilfred Owen (available in our book) “The Soldier,” by Rupert Brooke,” by Wilfred Owen and “The Soldier,” by Rupert Brooke I. Introduction A.
Poems are expressions of life through different types of emotions. “Compare and contrast “The Soldier” by Rupert Brooke with “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen with regard to theme, tone, imagery, diction, metre, etc” The Soldier by Rupert Brooke, and Dulce et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen are two poems which were written during the First World War, and both being written about this conflict.
The comparison and contrast of "The Soldier" by Rupert Brooke and "Dulce et Decorum" est by Wilfred Owen. The language used by Rupert Brooke and Wilfred Owen, for The Soldier and Dulce Et Decorum Est is vastly different from each other, even though both poems were about war/5(6).
The comparison and contrast of Wilfred Owen's and Rupert Brooke's approaches to the subject of war. The Soldier by Rupert Brooke and Dulce et Decorum Est.
Get an answer for 'Compare and contrast "The Soldier" by Rupert Brooke and "Dulce Et Decorum Est" by Wilfred Owen.' and find homework help for other Literature questions at eNotes.Download